How To De-Ess Vocals | Get Clear And Smooth Vocals 2024

Home > Blog > Mixing > Mixing Instruments

Disclosure: Some of the links below are affiliate links, meaning that at no additional cost to you, we will receive a commission if you click through and make a purchase. Read our full affiliate disclosure here.

De-essing vocals can differ between a polished, professional track and an amateur-sounding recording. Mastering this technique is essential for any serious producer or mix engineer looking to elevate their vocal productions.

De-essing is a specialized form of dynamic processing that reduces excessive sibilance in vocal recordings. Sibilance refers to the harsh, hissing sounds produced when pronouncing certain consonants, mainly “s” and “sh” sounds.

A de-esser plugin functions as a frequency-specific compressor, attenuating only the problematic high-frequency content when it exceeds a set threshold. This process helps balance the vocal track within the mix, improving clarity and reducing listener fatigue.

Proper de-essing requires a delicate touch and careful listening. Over-processing can result in lispy or muffled vocals while under-processing leaves distracting sibilance intact. Engineers must consider microphone choice, vocal performance style, and overall mix context when applying de-essing techniques.

Producers can master this skill to ensure their vocal tracks shine without harsh artifacts, creating a more enjoyable listening experience.

De-essing is a crucial technique in vocal processing that targets excessive sibilance. It helps create smoother, more polished vocal recordings by selectively reducing harsh high-frequency sounds.

De-essing is an audio processing technique used to reduce sibilance in vocal recordings. Sibilance refers to the hissing or whistling sounds produced when pronouncing certain consonants, mainly “s,” “z,” and “sh.”

This process is essential for several reasons:

1. It improves vocal clarity
2. It enhances listening comfort
3. It creates a more balanced mix

De-essing prevents harsh high frequencies from dominating the vocal track, allowing other mix elements to shine.

Vocal sibilance occurs naturally due to the way humans produce speech. When pronouncing sibilant consonants, air is forced through a narrow opening between the tongue and teeth or palate.

This creates turbulence, resulting in high-frequency sound energy. The sibilant frequencies typically range from 2 to 10 kHz, depending on the individual’s voice and recording conditions.

Factors that can exacerbate sibilance include:

• Microphone choice and placement
• Vocal technique
• Room acoustics
• Recording equipment quality

Excessive sibilance can lead to several problems in audio production:

1. Listener fatigue:
   Harsh high frequencies can cause discomfort during extended listening sessions.
2. Masking of other elements:
   Overly prominent sibilance can obscure other essential parts of the mix.
3. Unnatural sound:
   Exaggerated sibilance can make vocals sound artificial or poorly recorded.
4. Inconsistent volume:
   Sibilant sounds may appear louder than other parts of the vocal performance.
5. Distortion:
   In extreme cases, excessive sibilance can cause digital clipping or distortion.

De-essing significantly enhances vocal clarity and overall mix quality by addressing the issues caused by excessive sibilance.

It allows for more consistent vocal levels throughout a performance. Taming harsh frequencies and de-essing creates a smoother, more pleasant listening experience.

This process also helps vocals sit better in the mix. With reduced sibilance, other instruments and elements can be heard more clearly without being masked by sharp consonants.

De-essing enables higher overall vocal levels without introducing harshness. This results in a more professional-sounding production with improved balance and clarity.

De-essing is crucial for achieving polished vocal recordings. Effective techniques involve manual and automated methods, proper plugin usage, frequency identification, and careful balancing for natural results.

Manual de-essing involves using EQ and clip gain to reduce harsh sibilance. Engineers can isolate problematic frequencies and make targeted adjustments. This method offers precise control but can be time-consuming.

Automated de-essing utilizes plugins explicitly designed for this task. These tools analyze the vocal frequency content and apply gain reduction when detecting sibilance. They often provide controls for threshold, frequency range, and reduction strength.

Both methods have their place in a vocal mixing workflow. Manual techniques excel for spot treatment of specific issues, while automated plugins streamline the process for consistent results across an entire performance.

1. Insert the de-esser plugin in the vocal chain.
2. Set the frequency range to target sibilant sounds (typically 5-8 kHz).
3. Adjust the threshold so the plugin engages only on problematic syllables.
4. Fine-tune the gain reduction amount for natural-sounding results.
5. Listen critically and make minor adjustments as needed.

It’s essential to monitor the output closely. Over-processing can lead to lisping or dull-sounding vocals. Adjust attack and release times to match the performance’s dynamics.

Identifying sibilant frequencies is critical to effective de-essing. Use a parametric EQ to sweep through the high-mid range while the vocal plays. Listen for harsh “s” and “t” sounds, typically between 5-8 kHz.

Solo problematic sections and use a spectrum analyzer to visualize frequency spikes. This visual aid can help pinpoint exact troublesome areas.

Create a narrow EQ boost and move it through the sibilant range. When the harshness becomes most pronounced, that frequency is likely the culprit. Note this frequency for targeted de-essing.

Achieving natural-sounding results requires a delicate balance. Start with subtle settings and gradually increase processing until sibilance is controlled without affecting the vocal’s clarity.

Use parallel processing to blend the de-essed signal with the original. This technique preserves some of the natural air and brightness of the vocal.

Avoid over-de-essing, which can make vocals sound dull or lisp-like. Periodically bypass the de-esser to compare the processed and unprocessed audio.

Consider the vocal’s place in the mix. Sometimes, what sounds overly sibilant in solo may sit perfectly in the whole arrangement. Always make final judgments in the context of the entire mix.

De-essers come in both hardware and software forms, each with unique advantages. Their choice depends on budget, workflow preferences, and specific audio needs.

Hardware de-essers offer tangible controls and analog circuitry. The SPL De-Esser Collection emulates two renowned hardware units, providing classic single-band and modern dual-band options.

Software de-essers, like plugins, offer flexibility and integration with digital audio workstations (DAWs). FabFilter Pro-DS and Waves R-De-Esser are popular choices, known for their versatility and user-friendly interfaces.

Some software de-essers use advanced technology. Waves sibilance employs “Organic Resynthesis” for efficient sibilance reduction.

Hardware de-essers:

• Pros: Analog warmth, tactile control, zero latency
• Cons: Limited portability, higher cost, fixed functionality

Software de-essers:

• Pros: Cost-effective, easily updatable, preset storage
• Cons: Potential latency, reliance on computer processing power

Multiband users offer precise frequency targeting but may require more setup time. Single-band users are more straightforward but need to be more flexible.

Beginner (low budget):

• Stock DAW de-esser plugins
• Waves Renaissance De-Esser

Intermediate:

• FabFilter Pro-DS
• Waves Sibilance

Advanced (higher budget):

• UAD Precision De-Esser
• Sonnox Oxford SupResser V3

Hardware options:

• DBX 902 De-Esser
• Empirical Labs DerrEsser

Start by identifying problematic sibilance in your audio. Place the de-esser early in your signal chain, typically after initial EQ and compression.

For vocals, focus on the 5-8 kHz range where sibilance often occurs. Use the de-esser’s monitoring feature to isolate and target specific frequencies.

Experiment with different de-esser settings. Subtle adjustments often yield the best results. Over-de-essing can lead to lisping or dull-sounding vocals.

Consider using multiple de-essers for complex audio. A gentle application across various instances can produce more natural results than aggressive single-instance de-essing.

Advanced de-essing techniques allow for precise control over sibilance in vocal recordings. These methods provide flexibility and customization to achieve natural-sounding results across various vocal styles and arrangements.

Multiband de-essing offers greater precision by targeting specific frequency ranges. This technique uses split-band processing to isolate and treat problematic frequencies independently.

Engineers can set different thresholds and ratios for each band. This way, they can address sibilance issues without affecting the overall vocal tone. This approach proves remarkably effective for vocals with complex frequency content.

A typical multiband de-esser might divide the signal into three or four bands, focusing on the 3-12 kHz range where sibilance often occurs. By adjusting each band separately, producers can achieve a more natural sound and maintain vocal clarity and presence.

Sidechain de-essing is a powerful technique for managing sibilance in dense mixes or layered vocal arrangements. This method uses a detector to trigger de-essing based on the input signal’s characteristics.

The sidechain input can be filtered to focus on specific problematic frequencies. When the sidechain detects excessive sibilance, it activates the de-esser. This reduces gain only in the targeted frequency range.

This technique allows for more dynamic control as the de-essing effect adapts to the changing vocal performance throughout the track. It’s beneficial for maintaining consistent sibilance control across different vocal parts or harmonies.

Parallel processing involves blending the original signal with a processed version to achieve a more natural sound. For de-essing, this technique can help preserve the vocal’s character while reducing harsh sibilance.

To implement parallel de-essing, follow these steps:

1. Duplicate the vocal track
2. Apply heavy de-essing to the duplicate
3. Blend the processed track with the original

This method allows for fine control over the amount of de-essing applied. By adjusting the balance between the two tracks, engineers can find the sweet spot between sibilance reduction and maintaining vocal authenticity.

Parallel processing can also involve using multiple de-essers in series or parallel. Each de-esser can target different frequency ranges or apply varying amounts of reduction.

Automation is crucial in achieving consistent de-essing results across an entire vocal performance. It allows for dynamic adjustments that adapt to changing vocal intensities and tonal characteristics.

Key automation parameters include:

• Threshold: Adjust to match varying sibilance levels
• Range: Control the amount of reduction applied
• Frequency: Fine-tune the target frequency as needed

Automating these parameters ensures that de-essing remains effective throughout the track. It prevents over-processing quieter sections or under-processing louder parts.

Engineers can also automate the de-esser’s wet/dry mix. This way, they can apply more processing during particularly sibilant phrases and ease off during less problematic sections. This approach helps maintain a natural vocal sound while addressing specific problem areas.

De-essing is a crucial skill in vocal processing, but it’s easy to make mistakes. Proper technique involves balancing frequency targeting, considering mix context, and integrating with other vocal effects.

Over-processing is a common pitfall in de-essing. Excessive reduction of sibilant sounds can lead to unnatural and dull vocals. This issue often stems from setting the threshold too low or applying too much gain reduction.

To avoid this, start with subtle settings and gradually increase the effect. Listen critically to maintain the natural character of the voice. A good practice is to compare the processed audio with the original frequently.

Engineers should avoid removing all sibilance, as some is necessary for clarity and articulation. The goal is to reduce harshness while preserving the vocal’s essence.

Another common mistake is targeting the wrong frequencies. Sibilance typically occurs between 5-8 kHz, but this can vary depending on the vocalist and recording conditions.

To address this:

1. Use a spectrum analyzer to identify problematic frequencies
2. Sweep a narrow EQ boost to pinpoint harsh areas
3. Set the de-esser’s frequency range accordingly

Dynamic EQ can be an effective alternative to traditional de-essers for precise frequency targeting. It allows for more flexible control over specific problem areas.

De-essing should not be done in isolation. It’s crucial to consider how the vocals sit in the overall mix. Sibilance that seems excessive in solo may cut through the mix well.

Engineers should regularly toggle between listening to the isolated vocal and the whole mix. This approach ensures that de-essing decisions complement the entire production.

Consider how other elements, like cymbals or high-frequency synths, interact with vocal sibilance. Sometimes, addressing issues in these elements can reduce the need for aggressive de-essing.

De-essing should work in harmony with other vocal processing techniques. Compression, saturation, and EQ can all affect sibilance levels and should be considered when de-essing.

Compressors can exaggerate sibilance by reducing the overall level of the vocal while leaving the short, loud sibilant sounds relatively untouched. Placing the de-esser before the compressor in the signal chain can yield better results.

Saturation can introduce additional high-frequency content, potentially creating new sibilance issues. Engineers may need to adjust de-essing settings after applying saturation or experiment with the order of the effects.

EQ changes mainly boost in the high-frequency range and can interact with de-essing. It’s often beneficial to revisit de-esser settings after significant EQ adjustments to ensure optimal vocal treatment.

De-essing is a crucial skill for achieving polished vocal tracks. This technique requires practice, attention to detail, and the right tools. The following exercises and tips will help develop proficiency in identifying and addressing sibilance issues.

Improving sibilance detection starts with ear training. Listen to various vocal recordings, focusing on ‘s’ and ‘sh’ sounds. A spectrum analyzer visualizes frequency spikes between 5-8 kHz, often indicating sibilance.

Create a playlist of sibilant vocals and practice identifying problem areas. Loop short sections and try to pinpoint exact moments of excessive sibilance. This will develop the ability to recognize issues quickly in real-world mixing scenarios.

Try the “pencil trick” – hold a pencil vertically in front of your mouth while saying words with ‘s’ sounds. This can help physically demonstrate how sibilance is produced and improve understanding of its characteristics.

Establish a systematic approach to de-essing in your digital audio workstation (DAW):

1. Listen to the whole vocal track
2. Identify problematic sections
3. Apply a de-esser plugin
4. Set the frequency range (typically 5-8 kHz)
5. Adjust threshold and reduction amount
6. Fine-tune settings while listening in the context of the mix

Start with subtle settings and gradually increase reduction if needed. Use your DAW’s automation to apply de-essing only where necessary, preserving the natural character of the vocals in less sibilant sections.

Examine professional recordings across various genres to study effective de-essing techniques. Pop vocals often require more aggressive de-essing, while jazz or acoustic performances may need a lighter touch.

In pop productions, de-essing is crucial for taming harsh sibilance without compromising vocal clarity. The engineer should use a combination of multiband compression and targeted de-essing to achieve a balanced result.

Explore dedicated de-essing plugins from reputable audio software developers. Many offer free trials, allowing experimentation with different algorithms and interfaces.

Practice with isolated vocals stems from multitrack sessions available from various online sources. This provides a controlled environment to hone de-essing skills without other mix elements.

Join online mixing communities and forums to share techniques and receive feedback on your de-essing work. Participate in mix contests focusing on vocal processing to challenge your skills in real-world scenarios.

Consider enrolling in specialized audio production courses that cover advanced de-essing techniques as part of vocal processing modules.

Happy De-Essing!

The ideal de-esser threshold varies depending on the vocalist and recording. A good starting point is to set the threshold so it only engages on the harshest sibilants.

Adjust the threshold until you hear a reduction in excessive sibilance without affecting the overall vocal quality. Experiment with different sensitivity levels to balance sibilance control and maintain vocal clarity.

Dynamic EQ can be used to de-ess vocals. Set up a narrow band EQ in the sibilant frequency range, typically between 5-8 kHz. Apply compression to this band, reducing the gain when sibilance exceeds the threshold.

This method allows precise control over specific frequencies without affecting the entire vocal performance.

Focus on the 4-8 kHz range for male vocals. Female vocals often require attention in the 6-10 kHz range, varying depending on individual voices.

Use a spectrum analyzer to identify problematic frequencies in each vocal performance for more accurate de-essing.

Several free de-esser plugins offer quality results. TDR Nova by Tokyo Dawn Records provides dynamic EQ capabilities suitable for de-essing. Sleepy-Time DSP’s Lisp is another free option specifically designed for de-essing.

These plugins offer basic de-essing functionality without cost, making them ideal for beginners or budget-conscious producers.

Place the de-esser early in the vocal processing chain, typically after initial EQ and compression. This allows the de-esser to work on the raw vocal sound before other effects alter its characteristics.

Add another de-esser at the end of the chain to catch any sibilance introduced by subsequent processing.

For live vocals, use a hardware de-esser or a low-latency software plugin. Set a conservative threshold to prevent over-processing. Then, adjust the frequency range based on the vocalist’s characteristics.

Monitor the de-essed signal closely during soundcheck. Make real-time adjustments as needed during the performance.